Google+
Showing posts with label free range. Show all posts
Showing posts with label free range. Show all posts

Monday, April 27, 2015

Scams on Free Range & Organic Chicken

The Chicken Mafia are co-opting the terms "free range" and "organic" as a method of cheating and mis-leading the public, and gouging higher profits for themselves.

An anonymous poster on Better Farming was questioning the use of the term "free range", and how it is misused by some.

Free Range Chicken

My definition of free range is that the poultry has free and direct access to the great out of doors; can see the sun; can decompress and get away from their sisters; can walk through the pasture or woods at their leisure; can flap their wings & feel the wind on their feathers; eat any grub, grass, seed, or insect they happen to find; and do dust baths in the dirt of the forest floor to their heart's content. The 18" x 18" door on my coop is opened in the morning, and closed after everybody is back in the coop by dusk.

On my Small Flock poultry farm, we have LGD's (Livestock Guardian Dogs) who protect our birds, and keep them isolated.  If a crow, hawk, fox, coyote, or other wild animal is thinking about coming in to fraternize with our poultry, or steal an egg or chicken, the wildlife quickly reconsiders their plan due to our LGDs.

There are other Small Flockers who do pastured poultry on grass pastures using electric poultry netting, possibly supplemented by LGDs.

Pastured Poultry

On my Small Flocker farm, we are gearing up to do pastured broiler poultry this Spring.  Inside each 10 ft x 12 ft open air cage on a grassy pasture are 75 broiler chickens.  Each cage is moved forward every day to fresh grass for the birds to eat and scratch.  The birds receive a fresh patch of pasture during each day for their entire grow cycle.  Each patch of pasture is only re-used again after 6 weeks of rest and recovery.  Any bugs that enter through the chicken wire, seeds found, grubs in the dirt, or grass under the bottomless cage is welcome food for the birds, who then eat 40% less of the commercially manufactured feed which supplements the pasture.

Is "Organic Chicken" Better. or a Scam?

Beside free range, "Organic Chicken" is another weird definition that is used to confuse and mislead consumers.  The greedy SM cheats salivate over the 30% or higher premium prices available for "organic chicken".  The CFIA organic regulation says,

" 6.8.1 The operator of an organic livestock operation shall establish and maintain animal living-conditions that accommodate the health and natural behaviour of all animals, including:   a) access to the outdoors, shade, shelter, rotational pasture, exercise areas, fresh air and natural daylight suitable to the species, its stage of production, the climate and the environment;"

Unfortunately, the CAFO's (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations) and "Big Food" have lobbied, done regulatory capture, redefined, twisted, and misinterpreted the organic standard to suit their profit seeking goals.

If the CAFO cheaters open a 8" x 8" door at one obscure corner of a chicken factory barn holding 200,000 birds, and that door leads to a tiny screened-in porch, then the unholy alliance of CAFO cheats and Big Food often label their chicken "free range", and qualify for "organically raised" under the regulations.

Of course, the porch will hold only a tiny fraction (maybe a hundred birds or so) of the 200,000 birds, and even fewer birds ever discover the well hidden door.  Chickens are forced to live in the cesspool of CAFO chicken factories, the method used by most or all of Canada's Supply Management chicken growers.  CAFO birds are crammed in, cheek to jowl, as many as 196,000 birds on one farm.  The birds are forced to live in their own manure for their entire life, forced to breath the toxic dust cloud that never goes away.  They are force fed antibiotics, other drugs, and weird chemical brews so as to keep them alive in spite of the poor living conditions. 

Hopefully it will become clear to all consumers that CAFO chicken factories have found a convenient loophole in the regulations to subvert and mislead consumers, as usual.

Sooner or later, consumers will realize the fraud.  Eventually, the mounting breach of trust by SM's foul chicken factories will be exposed on these issues.  One day soon, all of those lies or half truths will totally rupture the trust between CAFO cheats and society, and the public will totally abandon this terribly flawed system.

Small Flocker Chicken Alternative


As an alternative to all of the crap, cheating, and misleading described above, small flock poultry farmers have an alternative we'd like to offer to Ontario and its citizens.

There are more than 15,000 Small Flock chicken farmers in Ontario.  If the government regulations were made more favorable to small flockers (as opposed to the monopoly of cheating and misleading Chicken Mafia henchmen), then some or most of Small Flockers would be ready, willing, and capable of growing safe, affordable, nutritious, locally grown chicken for their family, friends, and local communities.

The choice is clear.  We just need help getting the word out.  Once the public has all the necessary facts, then the public can make an informed decision.  Choice and freedom.  That's what a democracy is supposed to be all about.

That's exactly what the Chicken Mafia are fearful of, and are desperately fighting against.

Soon, you will need to stand up and make a choice as to which side you are on.

Friday, August 15, 2014

Food Quality & Nutrition: Factory Chicken Vs. Alternatives

By Jennifer Halton

Organic Chicken Offers a More Beneficial Omega-3 to Omega-6 Ratio
Although we were once advised to focus on foods low in saturated fat, and more recently those low in trans fats, the benefits of choosing foods with a favourable ratio of omega-3 to omega-6 fatty acids is increasingly clear. Therefore not only is it important to increase our intake of omega-3 fatty acids, but at the same time we need to control our intake of omega-6. Traditionally our diet had close to an equal ratio of these polyunsaturated fats, but according to an article published in Canadian Family Physician (2006) a typical North American diet now has a ratio close to 16:1 in favour of omega-6 fatty acids. This increased ratio may explain why cardiovascular disease and other chronic health problems are now much more prevalent. One way to lower this ratio is to carefully select the meats we eat, as the ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fats can vary widely.

Health benefits of adjusting the ratio
As mentioned in the article in Canadian Family Physician, omega-3 fatty acids are cardio-protective in several ways, helping to reduce inflammation, arterial narrowing and blood clot formation, while controlling the rhythm of our heartbeat. Meanwhile, Healthy Canada explains that omega-6 fatty acids are associated with inflammation, a risk factor for heart disease and stroke, as well as various other chronic health problems. Omega-3 fatty acids exert their benefits beyond the health of our blood vessels though. For instance, KwikMed advises that omega-3 fatty acids are needed for healthy brain development both in the uterus and during a child’s early years of life. These essential fatty acids also seem to protect our mental health, as Ascenta Health informs us that low intakes of omega-3 are associated with an increased risk of depression. Besides protecting our cardiovascular and brain health, Auum Omega 3 describes how the anti-inflammatory effects of omega-3s may also reduce our risk of diabetes, cancer and multiple sclerosis, which are less common among populations with a more favourable intake of omega-3.

Modifying our dietary intake
Oily fish are one of the best dietary sources of omega-3 available, with wild salmon providing more than 10 times as much omega-3 as omega-6 fats. However, choosing meats with a healthier ratio of these two fatty acids is another helpful way to regulate our intake of these fats. As shown in the table below, the ratio of commonly consumed meats varies between close to 2:1 and 27:1. Caribou offers the most favourable ratio of omega-3 and 6 thanks to the fact that the meat is naturally organic, grazing on grasses and other plants, which themselves are rich in omega-3 fatty acids. This is also why grass-fed beef also offers a more beneficial ratio of fats when compared to other domestic meats and particularly to grain fed beef. Of the other domesticated meats, chicken offers the best ratio of polyunsaturated fats, coming ahead of turkey and even beating wild duck. Offering the least favourable ratio by far is pork, so even if you choose lean pork, which is low in saturated fat, it has far more omega-6 by ratio than any of the other meats considered.

Meat
Omega 6 (mg)
Omega 3 (mg)
Omega 6: omega 3
Caribou
230
100
2.3
Grass-fed beef
80
21
3.8
Chicken
170
40
4.3
Lamb
310
60
5.2
Turkey
270
40
6.8
Duck (wild)
372
51
7.3
Duck (domestic)
670
80
8.4
Beef
187
20
9.4
Pork
222
8
27.8
Figures based on 100g of raw meat, using values provided by Nutrition Data

Omega-3 and omega-6 in organic chicken
While a nutrient analysis report by the Chicken Farmers of Canada (2014) showed there was no significant difference between the amounts of omega-3 and omega-6 contained in organic and non-organic chicken, this is contrary to previous findings. For example, a research paper shared on Academia.edu (2012) highlighted that a systematic review by scientists at Stanford University found that organic chicken contains significantly more omega-3 than its grain fed counterparts. As with grass-fed beef, this is due to the higher omega-3 content of plants growing in the pasture, especially leguminous varieties such as vetch and clover. Indeed an article published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (2005) showed that the fatty acid content of poultry is strongly influenced by the omega-3 and omega-6 content of their diet.

Based on this, nutritional data for commercially reared birds should show a less favourable omega-3 to 6 ratio. However, companies such as Tyson and MapleLodge do not provide complete nutritional information for their chicken, merely showing that it is low in saturated and trans fats, without giving a breakdown of their polyunsaturated fat content. For consumers still focused on saturated and trans fats, this is reassurance enough, but with increasing awareness of the benefits of meat with an optimal ratio of omega-3 and omega-6, this is not sufficient to convince those of us who know that organic poultry is a healthier choice.

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Choose: Frankenstein Chicken, or Naturally Raised Chicken?

Arsenic, banned antibiotics, antihistamines, Prozac anti-depressants, caffeine, and Tylenol.  Why are commercially produced chickens being fed these chemicals and drugs?

Click on the cartoon for a full size version.


Farmer: "For maximum profit, I need maximum growth.  You won't eat if you're asleep or sick, so you're getting caffeine to stay awake, Gravol to stop caffeine jitters, plus antibiotics, painkillers, and anti-depressants.  That should cover it."  Hens: "That shot he gave me yesterday made me sick as hell!".  Other Hens: "We need something to keep us alive if we're going to be living in our own manure".  Other Hens: "It's OK guys, it will all be over in 6 weeks".  Baby Chicks: "No thank-you.  I prefer to be organic!"
Thanks to Murray Stenton and his help illustrating these important issues


The big factory chicken producers must think it helps their profitability, or they wouldn't do it.

Is CFO (Chicken Farmers of Ontario) aware of what is going on in the Ontario mega commercial chicken factories?  Do they care, or purposely turn a blind eye to these risks and mis-guided efforts to maximize profits?

Arsenic
Arsenic in food and drink can be a big problem, causing poisoning and cancer.

In spite of arsenic being a known acute poison, 3-Nitro® (Roxarsone), NADA 005-414, a drug used for agricultural feeds for chicken and pork, was approved by the FDA on March 21, 1944. There have been several subsequent approvals for 3-Nitro® (Roxarsone) for combination use, the most recent being 2009.  Later, arsenic was found to be a carcinogen, yet the FDA continued to allow it to be used in animal feeds as Big Ag could earn more profits if they used arsenic.

In May 2006, Health Canada lowered the Canadian Drinking Water Quality Guidelines to 10 ug/L (millionth of a gram per litre) based on recent information on the carcinogenicity of ingested arsenic.

Bacteria are hurt by arsenic too.  That is why arsenic has been shown to prevent infections in the high density, cheek to jowl chicken factories.  Adding arsenic to chicken feed causes a 4.1% greater weight gain due to metabolic disturbances created in the chicken.  So we risk poisoning people, or giving them cancer so as to gain 4.1% extra profit.  Thanks, chicken factory owners, we appreciate your thoughtfulness.

Arsenic also adds a nice pink colouring to the meat.  Consumer studies show that consumers can be fooled at the meat counter into buying poultry meat that has an eerie pink hue, as opposed to the whiter, non-arsenic chicken colour.

Note that free range chicken tends to be naturally more coloured, a colouration that is attempted to be copied by lacing the meats with arsenic.  Let's see, arsenic-laced or free range, is there a preference there you'd like to make as a consumer?

According to John Hopkin Bloomberg School of Public Health, the US EPA estimates that 70% of commercial chickens raised in the US were fed arsenic since the 1940's, and 80% market share for arsenic additives in animal feed are from Roxarsone brand organic arsenic.  Note that more than 10% of the chicken sold in Canada comes from the US.

In 1977, BC Broiler Marketing Board seized 40,000 kg of US chicken that was found to be laced with arsenic from Roxarsone in the chicken feed, declaring that Canadian chicken was better, and therefore US imports ought to be banned from Canada.

In Jan. 2007, Science News reported that bacteria in chicken litter are converting the organic arsenic residue in the chicken manure to inorganic arsenic, far faster than previously thought.  The inorganic arsenic dissolves into soils and surface water, and can then enter garden produce that was fertilized with arsenic contaminated chicken manure, and drinking water gets contaminated from farm runoff.  Inorganic arsenic is far more poisonous and carcinogenic than the organic arsenics that are fed to the chickens.

For example, on the Delmarva Peninsula (Delaware and portions of Maryland and Virginia) in the USA where 7% of the US chicken is produced, there are 600 million chickens raised per year which produce 1.5 billion kg of litter containing the chicken manure, which contain up to 50,000 kg/yr of poisonous arsenic, which then gets added to the local environment (ie. landfilled, or used as fertilizer to grow food).

Tyson, the world's largest chicken producer, stopped feeding arsenic in 2004 due to public furor about arsenic contaminated chicken meat.

In 2011, the manufacturer of Roxarsone voluntarily removed their product from the marketplace.  Canada banned roxarsone-type feed additives as of Aug. 8, 2012.  In July 2012, Maryland USA banned arsenical drugs and feed additives for chicken.

In 2012, US rice growers sued chicken farmers and drug companies for contaminating their rice crops with arsenic, where chicken manure was used as fertilizer.

In May 2013, John Hopkins Bloomfield School of Public Health published a study of chicken meat taken from across the US.  In spite of the legal requirement for factory chicken producers to withdraw arsenic-laced feeds sufficiently before slaughter so as to detoxify the meat, John Hopkins found significant levels of residual arsenic in the retail chicken meat samples.   They estimated that the arsenic residues would likely cause 3.7 additional incidents of bladder and/or lung cancer per 100,000 people exposed.

Remember how Canadian Chicken Marketing Boards seized arsenic-laced US chicken back in 1977 (see above)?  Oh, how times change.  If you can't beat them, you join them.  Apparently many, or a majority of Canadian factory chicken farmers followed the US lead, and have been feeding arsenic, antibiotics, and other drugs to Canadian chickens so as to obtain additional profit for themselves.

On August 8, 2012, Health Canada's ban on the addition of arsenic to chicken feed finally went into effect.

On Jan. 15, 2015 the FDA finally admitted that 70% of chicken in the US contained elevated arsenic residue from adding arsenic drugs to the chicken's feed or water.

So now that we know of their evil ways, does CFO ensure that Ontario chicken factories are in compliance with the recent roxarsone arsenic ban?  Did CFO test samples from Ontario chicken factories to ensure there is no cheating? Arsenic residues occur in the bird's feathers, manure, and liver, so its easy to collect samples to ensure compliance.  If not, why not?  You can ask CFO yourselves.  Email CFO about Arsenic

I put the same questions to CFC (Chicken Farmers of Canada).  Are you paying attention, finally?  Are you testing?  Canadian lives and health are at stake!  CFC has a website where consumers can directly ask CFC these tough questions.

Is CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency) also checking?  If not, why not?

Banned Antibiotics
Antibiotics are fed to animals, even when they aren't clinically sick, because it maximizes the weight gain.  Unfortunately, those same antibiotics cause super-bugs that are drug resistant, and drug residues in the meat medicate the consumer without their knowledge.  Some antibiotics that are critical to treating human disease have therefore been banned from use in animals.

In the 12 samples tested, six different classes of antibiotics were present, with between 2 to 10 different antibiotics in each sample.  Antibiotic residues were present in 100% of the samples taken.  In spite of the banning of animal use of antibiotics reserved only for human use, we now learn that chickens are being fed banned fluoroquinolones (such as Ciprofloxacin).

Note that WHO and CDC feels we are on the verge of losing effective use of most antibiotics due to the excessive use in animal.  More than 85% of all antibiotics produced in North America are used on animals, just 15% go to human use.  Antibiotics for animals is BIG business.

Caffeine
When a bird is sleeping, it isn't eating.  If you keep the birds awake longer, they grow faster, and the chicken quota boys make more money.  Hence, chickens are fed caffeine so as to keep them awake, so they keep eating and grow faster.

Caffeine was found in 100% of the samples tested.

Anxiety
If you ever drank too much coffee or too many energy drinks, you probably suffered from shaky hands and having your nerves on edge.  It a similar effect for chickens.  Nervous birds don't grow as fast, and are subject to falling sick. Stressed birds produce tough meat. If a person gets motion sickness, doctors sometimes prescribe Benadryl (antihistamines) to calm the person, thereby avoiding the nausea.  If you want to feed caffeine to grow your chickens faster, and you have over-stressed birds due to un-natural living conditions in your chicken factory, then you also have to feed antihistamines and/or Prozac-type anti-depressants.  Guess what, that's just what chicken factories do to maximize their profits.

Pain Medications
Acetaminophen (Tylenol's active ingredient) is probably fed to help birds survive the high density living conditions and the disease risks.  If your not feeling well, you tend to eat less, and heaven forbid that from affecting chicken factory profits.  Tylenol-like pain medication helps your suffering chickens to feel better, and keep eating.

Giving birds paracetamol (Tylenol-like drugs) can keep an avian flu infected bird going long enough to get them to the slaughter plant.

Canada's Position on Feeding Antibiotics   From CFIA
"World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) identified the fight against antimicrobial resistance as one of its priorities for 2012. The OIE also advocated for good veterinary control of the registration, import, distribution and on-farm use of antimicrobials."

"The OIE’s call for better control of antimicrobials echoes last year’s statement from the World Health Organization (WHO), which warned that the world is on the brink of losing these “miracle cures” due to the emergence and spread of drug-resistant pathogens."

"Macrolides and tetracyclines are often incorporated into feed for growth promotion or disease prevention, and fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins are frequently used to treat and prevent infections. Pathogens and commensal organisms resistant to these drugs in animals can be transmitted to humans, and the management of animal health then becomes a human health issue. The reverse can also be true."

After writing this Blog post, I am sick with a feeling of just how far mega chicken factories have wandered away from the natural order of things.  They are so far over the horizon, it is doubtful if they will ever find their way back to reality.

Fortunately, small flock poultry farmers stand at the ready to fill the gap created by the on-going mistakes of the arrogant, never admit to a mistake, mega chicken factory quota-boys.

Sources
 For more information, see the following:

May 12, 2005 Environmental Health Perspectives "Arsenic: A Roadblock to Animal Waste Management Solutions"

Oct. 2008 Ann N Y Acad Sci., "The environmental and public health risks associated with arsenical use in animal feeds"

April 4, 2012 New York Times, Arsenic in Our Chicken?

Mar. 21, 2012 Environmental Science & Technology, "Feather Meal: A Previously Unrecognized Route for Reentry into the Food Supply of Multiple Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs)