Google+
Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts

Saturday, May 9, 2015

Vampire Chicken: Affordable Chicken Vs. Government's Priorities

This Blog has dedicated itself to helping solve purpose and poverty through more affordable chicken and eggs.  What do the people of the world (and Canadians) tell us about these proposed priorities?

The World Values Survey (www.worldvaluessurvey.org) is:

"... a global network of social scientists studying changing values and their impact on social and political life, led by an international team of scholars, with the WVS association and secretariat headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden.

The survey, which started in 1981, seeks to use the most
rigorous, high-quality research designs in each country. The WVS consists of nationally representative surveys conducted in almost 100 countries which contain almost 90 percent of the world’s population, using a common questionnaire. The WVS is the largest non-commercial, cross-national, time series investigation of human beliefs and values ever executed, currently including interviews with almost 400,000 respondents. Moreover the WVS is the only academic study covering the full range of global variations, from very poor to very rich countries, in all of the world’s major cultural zones."

We have looked at a number of the questions and answers published in that database in hopes of confirming our proposed priorities.

Here are the findings from the World Values Survey:

  1. The most serious problem in the world is people living in poverty and need.  Canada agrees with the rest of the world, but feels the magnitude of this same issue somewhat less (likely due to the relative affluence of Canadians, as compared to other countries).

  2. When asked for the most serious problem in their own country, every country again voted people living in poverty and need as the #1 biggest problem, and also the #2 biggest problem.  Again, Canada agreed with the rest of the world.

  3. When asked about their opinion on competition (good vs. harmful), all of the world agreed that competition is good, to varying degrees.  The people of Jordan were the most convinced that competition was good (a weighted score of 85% support).  Canada ranked in 26th, with 84.5% of Jordan's score (ie. a weighted score of 71.85%), but strongly supporting competition.
So how does all of this apply to Small Flockers and Canada's Supply Management system for chicken and eggs?

Exactly how does the Chicken Supply Management System support and use competition?  Supply Management is the opposite to competition, the anti-thesis.  There is no competition whatsoever under Supply Management; neither within any province, nor between suppliers from other provinces, nor from suppliers outside of Canada.  Supply Management is a monopoly enjoyed by a chosen few millionaires, at the detriment of the vast majority of Canadians.  Supply Management gives unfair profits and privileges to just 0.01% of Canada's population, that must be paid by all consumers of chicken.

Exactly where and how does Canada's Supply Management system support or solve the social ill of people living in poverty and need?

The Chicken Mafia steals money from Canadians by charging 50% to 300% more for chicken than what the rest of the world pays on a $/kg. basis.  Therefore, Canada's Chicken Mafia makes the poverty and need worse.  The Chicken Mafia isn't making the situation better.

Chicken is (and should be) the cheapest meat, but chicken should be cheaper than what the Chicken Mafia allows.  Canada should have the goal of all grocery stores selling chicken that can be afforded by ALL Canadians.

If people can't afford chicken, they are forced to be vegetarians.

Health Canada reports that on average, 7.6% of Canadians cannot afford the food they need to feed themselves.  In some communities and social strata, it is as high as 75%.  I believe that is what the World Values Survey was discussing.

True, the chicken and egg millionaires give a few chickens and eggs to Canadian food banks each year.  Remember that this tiny bit of gifting is funded and derived from the greedy gouging and unfair conditions that the Chicken Mafia benefit from every day.

Giving back a tiny portion of those ill got gains is an insult, an attempt to bribe us with our own money.

Consider bank robbers who throw a handful of loose change into the air as they exit the bank with their huge bag of loot.  They throw those coins at the crowd so as to more easily escape in the crowd, by creating a riot and confusion as the starving masses try to grasp some of the loose coinage thrown at them.  Is that true charity and assistance by the bank robbers, or a ploy?  Is that the kind of charity we should applaud?  Those bank robbers are only giving away a tiny fraction of what they just stole.

Obviously lower cost chicken would help alleviate poverty and need.  Note the data this Blog previously presented, where somebody earning Minimum Wage in Ontario has seen the price of chicken become 37% less affordable during the 10 year period of  1995 - 2005 (see Blog Posting Unaffordable Chicken in Ontario).  Note that we found similar results for those living at the poverty line (see LICO Chicken), and the average Ontario family).

Canada's Chicken Supply Management System
is a Vampire, sucking on the blood of
all Canadians.  When will the governments
muzzle the Vampire Chicken they helped create?
Image Source
Obviously, under the reign of the Chicken Mafia, we are going in the wrong direction.

Canada is a democratic country, and the Canadian people clearly told our governments and the world that people living in poverty and need is the #1 and #2 problem in both the world and Canada.

Should Canada's governments listen to the Canadian people, or listen to the millionaire Chicken Mafia and their lobbyists?

The time will soon be here when the Canadian governments will need to listen.

For example, there is a reason the PC's no longer run the government of Alberta, after a reign of more than 40 years.  Simply put, we can call it a failure to listen, and a vote on Non-Confidence.

Listening by the government is best demonstrated by muzzling the vampire fangs of the Chicken Mafia who suck on the blood of Canadians every day.

Who knew that chickens had such sharp vampire fangs?

* * *
If you liked this Blog posting, please consider becoming a member of SFPFC, and/or donating to help support our efforts.

Monday, June 16, 2014

LICO-Chicken = "Let them eat Cake"

"Let them eat cake" has been attributed to callous aristocracy who were insensitive to peasants spending more than 50% of their income on bread, helping launch the French Revolution and the rapid increase in the use of guillotines.  Is Chicken Farmers of Ontario and the rest of the SM Chicken Mafia saying the same today?

Low Income Cut-off ("LICO") is one of the measurements used by the government to define who is living in poverty.  You are living in poverty if your total annual income, expressed as $/yr, is less than LICO (whether that income is from gambling, lottery winnings, wages, government welfare, bank interest, clipping your bond coupons, or fixed retirement pension income).

With the inflation or deflation of retail prices (eg. housing, energy, food, etc.), LICO goes up or down accordingly.

Chicken prices have had almost a continuous rise in prices for over 20 years (see Blog Posting Chicken Price Parity: will it ever come?, going up an average of 3.54%/yr for more than 17 years.  If the income of the poor has not been rising as fast as the price of chicken, then the poor are feeling the squeeze of unaffordable food.  So we pose the important question:

Is chicken getting more affordable, or less affordable for the average Canadian, and someone who is subsisting at LICO?

Scrooge McDuck counting and playing with his gold coins
(also known to to done by members of the Chicken Mafia)
To find out, all we have to do is divide LICO by the average retail price of chicken.  This provides us with the number of kg. of chicken that a LICO-earning person can purchase per year.  If the kg/yr of LICO-chicken is decreasing over time, then chicken is becoming less and less affordable for someone living at the LICO threshold.

CFO, and the rest of the Chicken Mafia seem only interested in maximizing their personal profits.  It seems they are busy counting their gold coins, like Scrooge McDuck.  They don't know about nor understand LICO, and don't want to know.

I believe that since they received their government created quota for free, and have been delegated government powers to enforce their quota, they should be acting as a proper steward, working for the greater good of all Ontario citizens.

Unfortunately, it appears that CFO, their members, and the rest of the Chicken Mafia have a callous disregard for everybody except themselves.  Witness the data on LICO-chicken:


Figure 1:  The number of kg. per year of retail chicken that can be purchased by someone earning
at the Lower Income Cut-Off ("LICO") Poverty Line.  LICO-chicken has been dropping at 1.3%
per year, down a total of 16% during the last 14 years.  This means chicken is becoming less
and less affordable by the poor.
The data in Figure 1 is derived from Statistics Canada CANSIM Table 326-0012 and ON Ministry of Labour report on Minimum Wage
and Statistics Canada LICO data with Census Agglomeration for an individual living in a community of 30,000 to 99,999 people, before tax income.  The amount of chicken that can be purchased at retail stores in Ontario by someone earning at the LICO Poverty Line has dropped 16.3% in the last 14 years (1997 - 2011).

By way of chickens having the lowest FCR of all farmed animals (Feed Conversion Level, see The Chicken Mafia Exposed ), chicken should be the cheapest available meat.

If you cannot afford chicken, your poverty has forced you to become a vegetarian.

LICO is affected by many complex factors.  CFO and the Chicken Mafia contribute to, but do not control nor overly influence LICO.  However, CFO and the Chicken Mafia have direct control and supreme influence on the price of chicken, from the farm gate, all the way through to the retail meat counter.

Not only do CFO and the Chicken Mafia have the ability to control chicken prices, I believe they have the duty to control chicken prices on an on-going basis in the best interest of the citizens.  I believe CFO has that duty of responsibility for LICO-chicken as long as SM is allowed to continue in its present form.  If CFO continues to ignore LICO-chicken, doomsday for Ontario's chicken SM system may be far sooner than they would have dreamed possible.

Is CFO aware of this trend they created?  Does CFO care?

Did I just hear somebody within Chicken SM shout:
"Can't afford chicken?  Let them eat cake!"

Now that I have exposed CFO's negligence and callous disregard for the poor, will CFO study the matter, and assemble a plan to reverse the trend of LICO-chicken?

Will Ontario's Minister of Agriculture Kathleen Wynne order Ontario Farm Product Marketing Commission ("OFPMC") to consider LICO-chicken every time CFO tosses in another request to increase the farm gate price of chicken?

Under Ontario's Farm Products Marketing Act, CFO has been delegated sweeping, broad powers over everything within Ontario that is directly and indirectly associated with chicken.  For the most part, CFO continues to ignore and abdicate its authority over the chicken marketing and processing system beyond the delivery of chicken to the abattoirs.

Will CFO continue to ignore the impact of allowing the billionaire mega food corporations to extract the maximum profits that they please, making chicken less and less affordable for the poor and everybody else?

If CFO is unwilling or unable to act on LICO-chicken, will OFPMC order CFO to exercise the full scope of its delegated powers, so as to rein in the processors and distributors of chicken in Ontario?  

If CFO put their minds and efforts towards LICO-chicken, they should be able to achieve an improvement of 10%/yr in the kg/yr of chicken that a person living in poverty can afford.

While we are at it, why aren't all basic necessities of life judged in a similar manner by governments, as the yardstick we can all use to determine if our politicians and bureaucrats are earning their keep?

If life is more and more affordable for the poor, likely it is more affordable for everybody.