Will those savings slowly work their way through the non-competitive Supply Management system and their cronies, eventually arriving at the retail meat counters as more affordable chicken for Ontario consumers?
 |
| Figure 1: CFO's Live Chicken Farm Gate Price, as compared to price of farm Input Costs (day old chicks and chicken feed) |
Don't hold your breath.
Figure 1 at right shows Chicken Farmers of Ontario ("CFO's") data for the cost of live chickens at Ontario farm gates (using left vertical axis), as well as the price of Farm Inputs (500 day-old chicks, and a tonne of chicken feed; both input costs are using the right hand vertical axis). I used 500 chicks and a tonne of feed so that the cost of feed and chicks was the same price magnitude and could all be graphed together on same graph.
What can we learn?
The price of chicken has dropped by 0.13% on an annual basis during 2014. Was any of that decrease caused or contributed to by improvements made by Ontario's chicken farmers?
Most businesses and governments are expected to improve on a continuous basis. Why not CFO and the Chicken Mafia?
Chicken farmers are guaranteed a "reasonable return" on their efforts and investment. In exchange for that guarantee to chicken farmers, why can't we ask and expect them to continuously improve, just like we expect from everybody else?
Not just any kind of improvements, we want the most important kind of improvements. We want important improvements that reduce the retail cost of chicken for the people of Ontario. An improvement of just 0.13%/yr is a trifling, a rounding error. I doubt it was caused at all, as it could just as well have been an increase.
There is no plan to improve at CFO, in spite of what they may say.
CFO doesn't understand, and even worse, they don't even care.
Farm gate prices are primarily affected by chicken feed prices, and to a much less degree by the chick prices. I assume the chick prices go up as feed prices do, as the parents of the chicks must be fed chicken feed too.
Therefore there is a compounded effect for rising prices of feed, directly and indirectly through chick prices.
There is another issue that we need to discuss.
 |
| Figure 2: CFO's old system of price fixing |
In the old system, we received CFO's idea of the market prices of chicks and feed, the profit margins earned by the chicken farmers, and the resulting farm gate chicken price. In other words, data rich and verifiable by everybody.
Next, we look at CFO's new system, as shown in Figure 3.
Ontario Farm Product Marketing Commission ("OFPMC") says:
"Chicken Farmers of Ontario (CFO) and the Association of Ontario Chicken Processors (AOCP), initiated the work in 2012, and have invested considerable time and resources over the last couple of years to develop a comprehensive COPF.Sounds pretty good, eh? You can count on that. Everything politicians do is always described with rainbows and sunshine. Let's now look at the reality that occurred the very first time CFO applied the new regulation.
The Commission carefully considered the final submissions of the AOCP and CFO, as well as the comments received through the government's Regulatory Registry website in determining the final makeup of the COPF.
The full COPF is described in the regulation in a transparent fashion and includes provisions for the regular updating of the individual elements to ensure the formula remains current and reflects a reasonable return to efficient producers.
The Commission recognises this is a significant milestone in the ongoing evolution of the supply managed system for chicken and will continue to work closely with the CFO and AOCP during the transition to this new COPF."
What OFPMC is describing above, and what CFO is supposed to be doing is fully described in Ontario Regulation 402, R.R.O. 1990, CHICKENS — MARKETING, issued under the Farm Products Marketing Act. Figure 3 below shows CFO's public disclosure of their first implementation of Section 18 of this new Ontario Regulation.
 |
| Figure 3: CFO's new system |
As shown in Figure 3 (the "new improved system"), CFO plunks down a new farm gate price for Ontario chicken. For all we know, CFO's farm gate price was derived by throwing darts at the wall.
This regulatory method in Section 18 is extremely difficult to comprehend and verify
Who can verify this "improved system" and the number it produces?
Nobody!
How can this new system be seen as an improvement is beyond me. How is the new system more open, accountable, transparent, and beneficial for all? Even though CFO is a private enterprise (ie. a lobbyist for monopolistic chicken farmers and their friends), CFO is an action arm of the Ontario government for chicken Supply Management. As an arm of the government, they have a duty to be open, transparent, and accountable to the people of Ontario.
Look at what we get stuck with by the CFO and the Chicken Mafia (ie. CFO, AOCP, and all their chicken farmers, henchmen, coattail riders, and lobbyists).
It is a disgrace.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Off-topic commercial spam that's posted so as to help sell your wares will be deleted.
On-topic comments, where you behave yourself and play nicely, will remain posted; whether they are pro or con. Everybody needs to fully understand all points of view so that we can find a solution that encompasses everybody's concerns. Give it your best shot.
If you decide to post, your posting becomes part of the public record, and SFPFC has full rights to use it (or not) in any reasonable manner or medium that suits our purposes.
Before posting, please proofread, and correct as necessary. If you subsequently discover a need to fix your previous posting, make an additional posting that refers to the original posting, then set the record straight.