 |
| Data squeezed out of the super secret CFO via CFO's Motion to Dismiss hearing at OMAF Tribunal |
Remember Edward Snowden and his release of Top Secret NSA info?
Today I feel like I've done the same to Chicken Farmers of Ontario.
At right is Top Secret info divulged by CFO in their Motion filed with OMAF's Tribunal.
I've previously worked with multi-nationals who treated everything as Top Secret so as to protect their technologies and competitive advantage.
To me, it seems CFO takes "Top Secret for Everything" way beyond even those corporation's level of arrogance, xenophobia, and paranoia.
I'm not sure why CFO released this info, but they did, so here it is for all the world to see.
It appears that Ontario's Small Flockers has grown way past our last reported strength of 13,000 quota-exempt chicken farmers.
 |
| The amalgamation and concentration of ownership of quota is reducing the number of quota-bearing chicken farmers |
How does that compare to CFO's millionaire quota-based chicken farmers? The number of members in CFO's exclusive club have been dropping since 2002.
I wonder why?
Is this resistance of Small Flockers legitimate complaints jealousy, fear, or spite by CFO and its dwindling members?
P.S. Here is a copy of CFO's Motion to Dismiss, attempting to blow our appeal out of the water, preventing the public hearing of these important issues.
Guess why CFO wants to avoid the OMAF Tribunal, and keep everything Top Secret?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Off-topic commercial spam that's posted so as to help sell your wares will be deleted.
On-topic comments, where you behave yourself and play nicely, will remain posted; whether they are pro or con. Everybody needs to fully understand all points of view so that we can find a solution that encompasses everybody's concerns. Give it your best shot.
If you decide to post, your posting becomes part of the public record, and SFPFC has full rights to use it (or not) in any reasonable manner or medium that suits our purposes.
Before posting, please proofread, and correct as necessary. If you subsequently discover a need to fix your previous posting, make an additional posting that refers to the original posting, then set the record straight.